Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 89.02%. Comparing base (463e432) to head (9bb6358).
Report is 15 commits behind head on main.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3521      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   88.34%   89.02%   +0.68%     
==========================================
  Files         149      149              
  Lines      112915   116871    +3956     
  Branches   112915   116871    +3956     
==========================================
+ Hits        99753   104044    +4291     
+ Misses      10685    10406     -279     
+ Partials     2477     2421      -56     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Let's just finally figure out a secondary MSRV target for lightning-transaction-sync and affected crates instead? In the next few days I intend to take a look at potential candidates and propose a target that would make sense for LDK Node, and hopefully it would find adoption by affected BDK crates, too.

Sure, we could do that too. We should get that fixed ASAP, though, because it'd be nice to have passing CI to release 0.1...

Sure, we could do that too. We should get that fixed ASAP, though, because it'd be nice to have passing CI to release 0.1...

Alright, now opened a respective/alternative PR here: #3528

If we move forward with that I'll also land lightningdevkit/ldk-node#429, and when recently talking to BDK, they seemed happy to more or less follow whatever MSRV bump we propose. Also see bitcoindevkit/bdk#1750.

Okay, will only fix fuzz CI failures here, though I still want to do that.

Backported in #3536.